mayoral race, out of reach.

People tend to believe those they need to trust, including who to vote for, had I the opportunity the campaign would have started with the following.
In the end it comes down to whether people believe I have a personal agenda that encompasses the multitude of extremes attributed to me.
Did I deserve a night in jail because I was a threat to my kids or their mother,, ridiculous, the thought of hitting a women has never crossed my mind and my kids. I take the notion as a personal insult of the highest order.
Getting out of child support, another ridiculous statement as I can prove through the court order I am not and have never been in arrears. Another insult attributed to the legal aid lawyer Thornton that brought his legal aid rate up to full rate with the child support I gave consent to be held by the courts, in case I missed a payment dealing with cancer.
Drug abuse.. they dropped it when they couldn't find a single person that Id been around any white powder with. My work record for decades is slowing down to a 60 hr week for a rest. You can't do that abusing your body, even just a few drinks a night. People that don't know me buy into the cover up.
Mentally ill, delusional. No doubt losing my kids put me into a state of serious depression for years, but delusional.. fathers rights groups base gender bias because women will sole custody over 80% of cases but when there is even a whiff the government will pocket the child support it goes to 100%. Its no delusion the courts are using sole custody to generate revenue.
After cash from the criminals that took part.. the RCMP, I admit it. Sure why not and lots of money for the amount of suffering they caused over a piddly amount of cash.
Still using the lies but only using them in whisper mode even though they know its all lies with the goal of pocketing as much cash as they could.
Just that short list certainly gives motive to cash or vengeance or whatever one means by personal agenda.
Then there are the children of divorce.
Fifteen years ago I accurately predicted the results of the courts using sole custody to generate revenue to government through child support claw backs. BC double the child poverty rate from 1 in 10 to 1 in 5... in a decade. This became such a hot button issue BC ended the criminally heinous practice in 2015.
The question comes down to.. do you believe I'll every see a cash settlement from the RCMP or has the lack of investment due to no justice no investment that has given over 50,000 BC kids a better Christmas, my agenda?
The no investment no justice agenda started in 2000. I think the writing has been on the wall since then, its just recently the justice was replaced long ago with no investment.
Its now just. No Investment.
Given that justice was my main focus I'm more of a spectator and looking forward to a little free time.
2017
No Investment
vox

Simmering on the back burner

In 1998 I became an advocate for the children of divorce after discovering my children had little hope for justice.
By 2000 I had projected the results of the current status of the best interests of the child by family court using the current multitudes of academia studies and statscan reports. The results predicted were so painfully obvious yet only nominal interest by a few politicians only looking for votes. That made it painfully obvious the need to escalate to force.
The results justify force.. number one indicator of a criminal life style is childhood poverty.. Canada set new child poverty records. BC doubled child poverty from one in ten to one in five in a decade. Hundreds of thousands of children forced to grow up in poverty because the provinces claw back tens of millions in paid child support.
Only force could overcome the depth of evil the tax man operates in.
Only a criminal enterprise would systematically create mass childhood poverty for gain. You've heard the propaganda child support if for the children yet the American collection agency.. FMEP.. spends the bulk of its resources on collection that will wind up in government pockets. Fathers rights groups bemoan the courts are gender bias because of the high mother sole custody... but if there is even a whiff the child support will get clawed back it goes to one hundred percent.
Proof positive the courts are not gender bias.. they are tax bias. That kind of evil can only be fought with force.