Friday, May 19, 2017

Simmering on the back burner

In 1998 I became an advocate for the children of divorce after discovering my children had little hope for justice.
By 2000 I had projected the results of the current status of the best interests of the child by family court using the current multitudes of academia studies and statscan reports. The results predicted were so painfully obvious yet only nominal interest by a few politicians only looking for votes. That made it painfully obvious the need to escalate to force.
The results justify force.. number one indicator of a criminal life style is childhood poverty.. Canada set new child poverty records. BC doubled child poverty from one in ten to one in five in a decade. Hundreds of thousands of children forced to grow up in poverty because the provinces claw back tens of millions in paid child support.
Only force could overcome the depth of evil the tax man operates in.
Only a criminal enterprise would systematically create mass childhood poverty for gain. You've heard the propaganda child support if for the children yet the American collection agency.. FMEP.. spends the bulk of its resources on collection that will wind up in government pockets. Fathers rights groups bemoan the courts are gender bias because of the high mother sole custody... but if there is even a whiff the child support will get clawed back it goes to one hundred percent.
Proof positive the courts are not gender bias.. they are tax bias. That kind of evil can only be fought with force.

1 comment:

  1. The Force
    By 2000 our web site had gained international attention thanks to a few prominent individuals that supported our cause based on the best interests of the child.
    During the late nineties everyone had an email address.. from stock exchanges, money managers, investor groups.. from the mail room to the CEO.
    Using several email lists I had created I sent info on the magnitude of corruption it takes to force hundreds of thousands of children into poverty in the name of 'government needs it more'.. for what.. adscam,, paying off the corrupt RCMP?
    They all ended with the same message..
    No justice, No investment.
    By 2002 international investors started leaving Canada.. by 2006 they had completed their exodus in everything but raw resources and currency manipulation. Growth and wages stalled with more dissatisfaction with the economy.. debt is piling up with only higher taxes in response.
    Some have expressed concern over the painful process itself but it is no different than a union strike,, work to rule or cabs and trucks parking on roads over low pay.. its the kids against the government.. the ones that are already suffering over the courts setting the best interests of the government finances as priority.
    Its working and as painfully slow as it is.. its the only force that will end the corruption.
    No justice, No investment.
    2000
    vox

    ReplyDelete