That's how things got interesting

The 20th anniversary of advocating for the children of divorce is fast approaching.
In 1998 I joined a shared parenting group that had a global voice, thanks mainly to some very well connected individuals.
I had already sat in family court for a couple of years following other family court cases, trying to understand why the courts were ok with the mother of my children beating the kids to the ground every time they asked to see me, even on court ordered days. The primary action of the web site was of persistent denied access as a result of sole custody, which caused my concern for my children.
It was common knowledge that it was the courts judiciary duty to rule in the best interests of the child. By joining this group it was immediately apparent I was just one father of  literally hundreds of thousands of fathers that had been ejected out of their children's lives by the courts.
Most in the group blamed feminism for family court across the country having mother sole custody as the best interests. That's how things got interesting.
Obviously the courts position on denied access was nothing more than just 'recommending' the father have scheduled access to the children. The group in general was quite adamant feminism was responsible, pressuring the justice system with mottos like, 'all men are bad, all women are victims'. After sitting in family court for a total of 3 years the courts were far more interested in the financial aspect of the case and mostly about child support. Lawyers opened with child support in a custody hearing, totally against the rules and all any judge did was slightly admonished, 'Now you know Mr. Whatever.. Thornton... this hearing is not about child support but custody.
For years I assumed lawyers were just using child support or other financial aspects to strengthen the case for mother sole custody. With such a high mother sole custody rate it was easy to see why the group was fooled into thinking feminism was the driving factor. While youth in trouble are 80% single parent children it is not a problem with single parents.. poverty is the #1 indicator of a criminal life style and it certainly is criminal to force tens of thousands of kids to grow up in poverty by stealing their child support.
While I could certainly agree with the group something was amiss the results didn't match up what was really going on in court, the fixation mainly on child support, even though most hearings were about custody. If feminism was involved it would have to be courts using child support to punish the men. Even though many in the group leaned toward this conclusion there were to many conspirators for me. By 2000 I had read every study done on the children of divorce as well custody, crime and other rates.
The conclusion I came to was not feminism, as more mothers were getting screwed over child support than fathers. The high mother custody rate is nothing short of corruption of the system to generate revenue that will flow into government coffers.
Just because it is legal does not mean it is not criminal.
How many times have you heard child support is for the children which is a total lie...
Child support claw back is child support paid, then clawed back from single parents relying on the states welfare system. The justice system and the courts know child support is considered part of the governments revenue stream first and foremost. That is the truth. The American collection agency that collects the child support arrears even spends the bulk of its resources going after arrears that will wind up in the governments pocket.
While mother sole custody was high if there is even a whiff the child support will flow into governments pockets through child support claw backs... it goes to 100%. The courts are using sole custody to increate child support and the governments take, after the lawyers of course. It can't be more obvious its a scam to rip off the children of their child support. The courts are certainly not gender bias, that is just a smoke screen to hide the real fact the courts are tax bias.
The ugly brute holding our kids up by the ankles shaking any loose change out of their pockets is the tax man.
By 2002 I had labeled child support as the Non Custodial Parent Tax as it went to government. Child support claw back, which affected about 50,000 children just here in BC forcing them to grow up in poverty, while the government pockets the child support. Childhood poverty is caused by dead beat governments, not dead beat dads, just another cooperative cover up with fake news put out by MSM. The depth of deception is alarming to say the least even though it is common knowledge BC doubled the child poverty rate from 1 in 10 to 1 in 5 in a decade, right through a booming economy.
After another 12 years of making sure all the right people knew about the atrocities committed on children by ignoring their best interest in favor of enriching government, BC ended child support claw backs. That's how things got humorous.
Those that favored enriching government fought the truth with, 'child support is for the children' which our corrupt media made sure swamped the truth which is, child support whenever possible is for the government.
Those that opposed us labeled us as women haters but that flew out the window with ending claw back because it really favored mothers... which really caused the feminist to get a hate on for me.
On the other fathers rights groups no longer considered my efforts as positive because it did help mothers, lol it hurts government coffers so they have no warm spot for me in their hearts either.
Now you have to admit that is very humorous, feminists have always portrayed my as an enemy, fathers groups will not support helping the children if mothers get more money and governments protecting their revenue generator consider me an enemy which means the whole system is their army. Now that is a humorous conclusion
I know, it looks like the odds are stacked against me when it comes to ending the practices that corrupted the justice system. Not so, during my days with the shared parenting group a large number of influential people continued to support the reasons the group was first formed, shared parenting, the best interests of the child. They continue to support choking off the corruption.Claimer.
Every statement on the children of divorce, plural, I have made in any of my blogs, is from data, studies and witness statements.
'Child support is for the children' is a lie. It is for the government and they take it from our most vulnerable children.
Childhood poverty is caused by dead beat dads is a lie. It is caused by dead beat governments stealing the child support.
The courts are gender bias is false, the courts are tax bias and use sole custody to increase that revenue.
The best interests of the child is a lie. Across the country there are hundreds of thousands of children forced to grow up in poverty caused by child support claw backs, the governments slice.
Poverty is the number 1 indicator of a criminal lifestyle, 80% of the youth in trouble with the law are from that category.
That is the core of the corruption no justice, no investment is designed to choke off.
BC ended claw backs in 2015, Ontario this January. Small steps for me but giant steps for the children of divorce.
vox
That's the gist of it, a lot more details in previous posts.
Fair warning, it isn't over and 2018 is not the winds that bring change..it is the 20 year storm that will destroy and signal the start of rebuilding the dysfunctional system.
A system destroyed by corruption has never fixed itself... ever... it was replaced. 
vox

Investment is the carrot.

I'm holding the stick.
since 2000
No justice, No investment.

All I have ever asked for is justice, all I have gotten is corruption. The plan is to choke off the federal governments corruption previously mentioned, until it ceases to be a viable threat to Canadians.

The US effects of stimulus creating the record wealth gap is getting thin but where it leaves off the glut of $50 oil is taking advantage of the tens of trillions in cash accounts sitting idle. With trillions now betting on a stronger US economy NYSE is up over 11% since the start of the year. Just the opposite in Canada. After enjoying the commodities bubble followed by government spending on an irrational exuberance level, the TSE is basically flat for the year. 
For a decade investment in value added industry is below any notable level, and now including the only exception, raw resources, there is little investment getting by the choke.
Is it true I intentionally set out to destroy the Canadian economy, no. I set out to choke off the corruption which it just so happens feeds of the economy. As I have said before, a system broken by corruption has never fixed itself... ever.

I've listened to my father, never complain unless you can offer a solution.
Should choking off the corruption run into a road block, the solution that has presented itself is western separation. The financial choke has all but removed any doubt the federal government is dysfunctional, dead beat and broken by corruption.
I do belong to a western secessionist movement but I might as well be a card carrying conservative. Explaining that partisanship is a Wexit killer is quite simply trying to herd cats.
Besides several successful business ideas I've spent a lifetime of hard work in union and non union jobs which labels me as a financially conservative populous... or lol a cheap liberal. It gives me a unique view of the middle class. It is that view that incentives me to suggest the secessionists drop the political views in exchange for an inclusive western view.
Over the last 20 years I've done the ground work putting the carrot within reach, I still believe the future of the west will trump politics and an inclusive Wexit will result.
vox

The real Canada... rampant corruption.

I used the term rampant corruption on many occasions.. even describing it as from the top down and back up to the top.
I've described how corrupt the RCMP are by allowing little children to be brutally beaten rather than have their own criminal activities exposed. I've posted the documents on the corruption between a government agency and a contractor for the justice system under the purview of the attorney generals office. How many of the top brass got a cut of the $40 million for looking the other way the previous liberal government pocketed out of the national treasury? A million in overtime for Nuttal RCMP faked incident?
I've posted the documents that involves corruption in the levels of the justice system right down to the heart of the justice system, the courts.
While it all undeniably says rampant corruption, the following leaves no question on the top down and back up of corruption.
Last year I was offered a short exploratory trip down south including the cost of a passport. I agreed as I've had 4 previous passports and 2 criminal records checks so it won't be a problem.
A on the previous 4 passports I used my stepfathers last name on the application.. I've had it since before I was born but due to some language difficulties I was listed under my birth fathers name but never used it. The clerks manager ruled the only name I've ever used was not legal and to get a 5th passport I would have to do a legal name change. Not impossible but certainly enough to kill the trip and even though it says on my first passport under my stepfathers name it states my BC has my birth fathers name. They also decided the, always been there, small crack in the finish of my BC was not acceptable which again is doable by applying for a replacement. I sent the Ontario registrar all the required info including photocopies that satisfied all aspects of the application. They posted on the inquiry page they had received my application and it will be completed 6 weeks after it was received. After 11 weeks I called and was to a query would be sent to find the status of the application for a replacement. a week after that I the inquiry page noted they wanted more info and sent a request to me. when I didn't receive it after 2 weeks I called again and was given the reason for the delay which is nothing more than a written conformation from me that the info I put on my application was in fact true. A month went by and still no request for the hand written note from me.
In summery after the 6 week waiting period and another 3 waiting on the mail it took a call from me and another week to find out what the holdup was. In total even if things were still on track it would take 16 weeks for the advertised 6 weeks. All because they want conformation from me that what I wrote,,, wax true. Now they want me to write out my 4 names to confirm the 4 names of my BC I photocopied and added in the application was true.
The reason I was bullied out of school was my inability to control nerves enough to be able to write so its obvious if I sent my 4 names printed out it will result in another delay. More proof of rampant corruption and more importantly the proof of corrupt from the top down and back up.
I have previously proven the slime of corruption stretching between provincial entities and a federal entity. This is a clear link between refusing me a 5th passport on a regulation that only apples to immigrants and a provincial entity that has almost tripled the application time just to get a BC.. from another province to a federal agency intentionally ignoring Canadian law.. and I'm the lucky recipient.. I think we know why, the truth is the enemy of corruption.
The evidence is undeniable which should have by now started the country on the road to redemption by disbanding the RCMP.. which is why they continue to deny.
No justice, No investment
vox

No justice, No investment.. vox

02-     03-     04-     06-     08-     09-    10-     12-     14-     15-     17
                                                                                                   D-21
           
                                                                                        D-18   S-2.1
                                                                               D-17 S-2.0
           
                                                                          S-1.8      T-15    T-15
                          D-14                                              D-14 
                D-13              T-13     
                           T-12                                 T- 12     

D-11      T-11              S-1.4             T-11   
                         S-1.3              T-10 D-10    S-1.3 
                                                        S-1.2   
S-1.1T-8. S-1.1            D- 8.     
T-7.S- .9                                  S-.9
-------------
In Thousands
Toronto stock exchange 2002 - 2017
Bold  S+P                            2002 - 2017
Italic DOW                         2002 - 2017
Does not correlate to historic oil prices.
Follows currency speculation.
Connect the dots.. Why bother right, it shows what we all know, Canada is in the toilet. The crap that required creating no justice no investment has filled it to the brim, flushing is required before it spills out everywhere.
-------------------------------------------------------
Although many sorted and heinous details could be added the blog lists my justification for No justice, No investment. The financial choking of the corrupt Canadian system through exposing it via social media since 2000. More on www.lawlessfmep.blogspot.com
After 4 years of continuous victimization by the system starting in 1996 it was obvious there was no justice to be found in a system rampant with corruption. It was also obvious that doing the right thing in favor of making cash flow to the top, it was the cash that would bring it down and justice would have to emerge before it stopped crashing.
Have you wondered why the RCMP refused to hold a separate investigation along side the Gomery inquiry.. elections Canada would have to hold the evidence that would have should who was elected on the $40 million burglarized from the national treasury. How much cash changed hands to make it happen is the problem Afghanistan has, corruption, paid to look the other way.
How many RCMP members split the million in overtime earned with the  fabricated terrorist plans of Nuttal?
Every corner from the courts using sole custody to generate child support claw backs to the RCMP looking the other way for political reasons or one of their own involved in criminal activity, the stink of corrupt as predicted has circled the globe.
In 2000 I created email lists of every stock exchange, brokerage house and money managers who conveniently listed their email address on the company web site, including boards of directors,, yes separate list and btw I excluded anything Canadian.
My news letter contained articles of corruption, obvious cover ups they are too arrogant to bother to hide, with statistics and raw data and documents. All the reasons why international investors should shun the rampant corruption of the justice system allowing rampant corruption throughout from top to bottom and back up.
They were signed with, No justice, No investment.
In conjunction with a shared parenting group with an international voice I joined in 1998, no justice because a threat to our corrupt system, and lol, I didn't make any new friends in our government. The predictable outcome of using sole custody to generate revenue forced hundreds of thousands of children into poverty, the number one indicator of a criminal lifestyle. Vancouver property crime increased to four times that of NYC as the child poverty rate in BC doubled in a decade from 1 in 10 to 1 in 5.
A decade after no justice circulated the predicted outcomes were obvious, and BC was forced to abandoned it child support claw back program September 1st, 2015, Ontario followed this January 1st. The rest of Canada is still too arrogant to consider the implication of the international support of the children of divorce.
No reasonably intelligent person would tie up large sums in a country that looks the other way, unless its an out of country company or investors, then who will you turn to, the corrupt RCMP who not only look the other way but scammed the made up Nuttal terrorist activity for a million in overtime without anyone raising issue, some countries call that fraud among other things.. better to stay away.
No need to go into much more detail than investors started leaving Canada in 2002 and had completed their exodus by 2006 in everything except raw resources and currency speculation.
By 2015 it was obvious the federal government, the provincial government, the RCMP and the courts intended to ride out the storm, typical mentality of a criminal leaning. There was nothing left to do but fire a full salvo, sink enough to make them reconsider. The graph bares out that the program has had an impact on the Canadian economy. With record child poverty caused by half our workers living paycheck to paycheck through more than a decade of stagnant wage growth.
The situation will continue the rapid decay of the last 2 years just like the moral values of all our political parties.
The law will be recognized and upheld.
No justice, No investment
vox

mayoral race, out of reach.

People tend to believe those they need to trust, including who to vote for, had I the opportunity the campaign would have started with the following.
In the end it comes down to whether people believe I have a personal agenda that encompasses the multitude of extremes attributed to me.
Did I deserve a night in jail because I was a threat to my kids or their mother,, ridiculous, the thought of hitting a women has never crossed my mind and my kids. I take the notion as a personal insult of the highest order.
Getting out of child support, another ridiculous statement as I can prove through the court order I am not and have never been in arrears. Another insult attributed to the legal aid lawyer Thornton that brought his legal aid rate up to full rate with the child support I gave consent to be held by the courts, in case I missed a payment dealing with cancer.
Drug abuse.. they dropped it when they couldn't find a single person that Id been around any white powder with. My work record for decades is slowing down to a 60 hr week for a rest. You can't do that abusing your body, even just a few drinks a night. People that don't know me buy into the cover up.
Mentally ill, delusional. No doubt losing my kids put me into a state of serious depression for years, but delusional.. fathers rights groups base gender bias because women will sole custody over 80% of cases but when there is even a whiff the government will pocket the child support it goes to 100%. Its no delusion the courts are using sole custody to generate revenue.
After cash from the criminals that took part.. the RCMP, I admit it. Sure why not and lots of money for the amount of suffering they caused over a piddly amount of cash.
Still using the lies but only using them in whisper mode even though they know its all lies with the goal of pocketing as much cash as they could.
Just that short list certainly gives motive to cash or vengeance or whatever one means by personal agenda.
Then there are the children of divorce.
Fifteen years ago I accurately predicted the results of the courts using sole custody to generate revenue to government through child support claw backs. BC double the child poverty rate from 1 in 10 to 1 in 5... in a decade. This became such a hot button issue BC ended the criminally heinous practice in 2015.
The question comes down to.. do you believe I'll every see a cash settlement from the RCMP or has the lack of investment due to no justice no investment that has given over 50,000 BC kids a better Christmas, my agenda?
The no investment no justice agenda started in 2000. I think the writing has been on the wall since then, its just recently the justice was replaced long ago with no investment.
Its now just. No Investment.
Given that justice was my main focus I'm more of a spectator and looking forward to a little free time.
2017
No Investment
vox

Simmering on the back burner

In 1998 I became an advocate for the children of divorce after discovering my children had little hope for justice.
By 2000 I had projected the results of the current status of the best interests of the child by family court using the current multitudes of academia studies and statscan reports. The results predicted were so painfully obvious yet only nominal interest by a few politicians only looking for votes. That made it painfully obvious the need to escalate to force.
The results justify force.. number one indicator of a criminal life style is childhood poverty.. Canada set new child poverty records. BC doubled child poverty from one in ten to one in five in a decade. Hundreds of thousands of children forced to grow up in poverty because the provinces claw back tens of millions in paid child support.
Only force could overcome the depth of evil the tax man operates in.
Only a criminal enterprise would systematically create mass childhood poverty for gain. You've heard the propaganda child support if for the children yet the American collection agency.. FMEP.. spends the bulk of its resources on collection that will wind up in government pockets. Fathers rights groups bemoan the courts are gender bias because of the high mother sole custody... but if there is even a whiff the child support will get clawed back it goes to one hundred percent.
Proof positive the courts are not gender bias.. they are tax bias. That kind of evil can only be fought with force.

Filing criminal informations.

If you've read much of this blog you'll know the even bypassing the police and the prosecutor and filing charges directly with the courts.. the courts are easily corrupt enough to squash the charges without reason.
I'll post the complete list of charges and people, some of which are contained in this blog, after I file it with the courts and get a response.

http://www.cbabc.org/For-the-Public/Dial-A-Law/Scripts/Criminal-Law/215

Charge the person yourself—if the police won’t investigate or the prosecutor won’t charge the person and you still disagree with their decisions, you can ask a Justice of the Peace (a JP) to charge the person based on “private information”. If the offence is in the Criminal Code, a JP has to accept the charge.

January 23, 2017
Putting a decade of abuse into an acceptable legal document isn't any easier than living in through it.
I made a comment a couple of decades ago proposing the systematic failure to abide by the law and the deceit and inevitable cover up that goes along with rampant corruption will collapse the system all on its own.
BC doubling the child poverty rate in a decade from 1 in 10 to 1 in 5 when 90% of child support is paid, and the crime rate cover up are the results. A top G-8 economy followed by half the people with a job is living paycheck to paycheck with the fastest growing wealth gap are the results.
No justice, No investment didn't kick in strong enough or fast enough to turn the ship even though the last 9 quarters of investment in Canada were negative. See second comment.
I don't expect filing criminal information with the courts will ever see a second hearing but that result will excel as an enforcement to no justice...still the only path to justice.